While watching Mona
Lisa Smile and thinking about how knowledge is constructed, there were a
few scenes that made me think about the nature of knowledge and how one accepts
certain knowledge as the Truth. One particular scene that stood out to me was
where the Art teacher Katherine Ann Watson is sitting in a meeting with the Collages
head officials and they make note of her thesis paper. I hope I can get this
right but it was something like, that Picasso will be a great artist to watch
as he will be influential in movements, similar to Michelangelo. Here the man addresses her thesis as if it was
a bit comical and useless and even questions the teacher if she has ever even
been to Europe before, as if to say you can’t possibly be comparing Picasso to
Michelangelo. Watching this today we know this is either funny or thought
provoking because Picasso has truly made his mark in the world today. It is
most likely because this teacher is not a Doctor yet, a woman, and challenges mainstream
views, that her knowledge is cast aside by others as unworthy and
insignificant. It has use ask, does one have to go to the Sistine Chapel to understand
art?
When the absolute Truth as we know it is questioned does its
followers usually resist new knowledge by devaluing it and understanding it as
not quite good enough to be true knowledge? It seems that sometimes many people
have to accept the knowledge before it is deemed absolute, however there are
also times where an influential “right” particular person can declare ideas as
the Truth. It is important to realize that knowledge is constructed and the
value of different knowledge is controlled by powerful structures. This film
and this particular scene opened my mind to understanding how we all are
capable of creating knowledge, but powerful structures often influence people
in what they think is valuable knowledge.
-Week 1
The power structures are a key to understanding what knowledge we think is of most worth.
ReplyDelete